Is the TMD equation in the user manual correct?

From: Mert Gür (gurmert_at_gmail.com)
Date: Tue Oct 02 2012 - 12:43:00 CDT

• Next message: ´ÞÓ×Ìñ: "Cuda errors in Ubuntu12amd64"
• Previous message: Ramesh Cheerla: "handling buckingham potentials in NAMD - regd"
• Next in thread: JC Gumbart: "Re: Is the TMD equation in the user manual correct?"
• Reply: JC Gumbart: "Re: Is the TMD equation in the user manual correct?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Dear all,

I wonder if the equation shown in the following link is correct?

http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/2.7/ug/node41.html

Is it k or k/N. If it is k/N (as written in the link) then there must be a
second division by N in the source code (
http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/doxygen/GlobalMasterTMD_8C-source.html)
which I can not find.

Can anyone comment on this?

Best,

Mert

• Next message: ´ÞÓ×Ìñ: "Cuda errors in Ubuntu12amd64"
• Previous message: Ramesh Cheerla: "handling buckingham potentials in NAMD - regd"
• Next in thread: JC Gumbart: "Re: Is the TMD equation in the user manual correct?"
• Reply: JC Gumbart: "Re: Is the TMD equation in the user manual correct?"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Dec 31 2013 - 23:22:39 CST