From: maria goranovic (mariagoranovic_at_gmail.com)
Date: Sun Jun 24 2007 - 07:06:32 CDT
Thankz you Peter and Subramanian for the comments.
It looks like ABF will be the most straightforward method to use.
But ABF seems to involve using external forces along some reaction
coordinate besides the constraints that I am interested in . Is that correct
? I would like to keep the rest of my system under no external force or
energy. Can that be done using ABF ? If so, could you please advise me how ?
Thank you again,
-Maria
On 6/21/07, Peter Freddolino <petefred_at_ks.uiuc.edu> wrote:
>
> If all you're attempting to do is get the helix formed the easiest and
> fastest way to do it currently is probably to invoke the abf module and
> apply dihedral constraints through it; these would be harmonic
> constraints. If you're feeling more adventurous, the CVS version of namd
> includes a new feature (extraBonds) that allows you to specify such
> constraints directly and have them calculated along with other
> interactions of the applied type; going that route would require getting
> a cvs account and messing with some new features. Option 3 is also a
> good one, although you don't seem to like it...
>
> As far as speed is concerned, options 1 and 2 will have roughly the same
> speed since they're doing the force calculations in tcl and not in the
> (parallelized) namd bonded force evaluation routines. Option 3 and
> extraBonds should be faster than 1 and 2, and will be equivalent to each
> other.
>
> Peter
>
>
>
> maria goranovic wrote:
> > Er.. anyone ?? Help !!!
> >
> >
> >
> > On 6/19/07, *maria goranovic* <mariagoranovic_at_gmail.com
> > <mailto:mariagoranovic_at_gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > I want to restrain about 20 random coil contiguous residues to a
> > helical conformation, while leaving the rest of my protein intact.
> > According to the documentation, there are at least three ways to
> > do this:
> >
> > 1. Using a tcl forces script, like the one recommended in the
> > manual.
> >
> http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/namd/2.6b1/ug/node32.html#SECTION00096700000000000000
> .
> > However, the script may get slightly tedious for 20 operations.
> > 2. Using the restraining options in the free energy methods. But
> > here, the free energy routines will need to be invoked, which
> > might slow the overall calculation, because an unnecessary
> > derivative will be calculated each step.
> > 3. Modify the psf to define new residue types and new dihedrals (I
> > want to avoid this).
> >
> > My questions:
> >
> > a. Which is the recommended method in terms of saving of
> > computational time ?
> > b. In the free energy method, is the dihedral restrained
> > harmonically throughout the simulation like it would be in the TCL
> > forces script ?
> > c. In terms of added potentials and forces, is the effect of using
> > a tcl forces script or a restraint in a free energy calculation
> > similar to that, say of using standard harmonic constraints in NAMD
> ?
> >
> > My goal is to investigate the effect of the coil-helix
> > transformation on the loop region next to the protein region in
> > question.
> >
> > Any suggestions please ? All partial answers are also welcome :)
> >
> > -Maria
> >
> > --
> > Maria G.
> > Technical University of Denmark
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Maria G.
> > Technical University of Denmark
> > Copenhagen
>
-- Maria G. Technical University of Denmark Copenhagen
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 15:44:52 CST