RE: PCA calculation

From: Chang, Christopher (
Date: Thu Feb 14 2008 - 12:58:55 CST

This was obviously a tongue-in-cheek statement meant as a joke. If you don't find it funny, deal with it and stop spamming everyone on a mailing list with pointless diatribes.

Christopher H. Chang, Ph.D.
Scientist II
National Renewable Energy Laboratory
1617 Cole Blvd., Mail Stop 1608
Golden, CO 80401
Phone (303) 275-3751
Fax (303) 275-4007



        From: [] On Behalf Of Richard Wood
        Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 9:00 AM
        To: namdmail
        Subject: Re: namd-l: PCA calculation
        Hi all,
        At the risk of getting yelled at by someone, I'd like to know why one would make the statement, "Even though writing own programs is better"? It seems to me that is one's own personal opinion, and has nothing to do with science or doing science, or even using NAMD.
        Again, not all of us are programmers, and I wish those of you that think we should be would stop reminding us that we should be.
        Let's discuss the use of NAMD to solve scientific problems, shall we?

        Richard L. Wood, Ph. D.

        ----- Original Message ----
        From: ramya narasimhan <>
        To: namdmail <>
        Cc: Nicholas M Glykos <>
        Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 10:59:49 PM
        Subject: Re: namd-l: PCA calculation
        Hi all,
                    Thank you so much for all your valuable tips. I have tried carma which works fine. (To Glykos : the command works perfectly). Even though writing own programs is better, there should be some standard reliable scripts to test our program. Anyway I try even this way.
        Thank You All


        Get the freedom to save as many mails as you wish. Click here to know how. <*>


        Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage. <*>

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 05:20:54 CST