**From:** Himanshu Khandelia (*hkhandel_at_memphys.sdu.dk*)

**Date:** Thu Nov 22 2007 - 02:19:55 CST

**Next message:**David Hardy: "Re: Is there solution to numerical inaccuracy"**Previous message:**Chris Chipot: "Re: ABF calculations"**In reply to:**David Hardy: "Re: Is there solution to numerical inaccuracy"**Next in thread:**David Hardy: "Re: Is there solution to numerical inaccuracy"**Reply:**David Hardy: "Re: Is there solution to numerical inaccuracy"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

*> Hi,
*

*> For different parallel runs, NAMD will perform non-deterministically, in the
*

*> sense that the order of completion of different processors (and even the work
*

*> that is assigned to them) will likely change, altering the order of summed
*

*> energies. Due to the non-associativity of floating point addition, you should
*

*> eventually see slightly different energy values from two parallel runs of an
*

*> identical trajectory.
*

I thought the non-reproducibility of simulations in NAMD was mainly

because of the Berendsen pressure controller employed, which gives random

kicks to particles every few steps. Whether or not the run is parallel, I

do not think the trajectories will be reproducible, although I have not

tested this myself.

**Next message:**David Hardy: "Re: Is there solution to numerical inaccuracy"**Previous message:**Chris Chipot: "Re: ABF calculations"**In reply to:**David Hardy: "Re: Is there solution to numerical inaccuracy"**Next in thread:**David Hardy: "Re: Is there solution to numerical inaccuracy"**Reply:**David Hardy: "Re: Is there solution to numerical inaccuracy"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6
: Wed Feb 29 2012 - 05:20:46 CST
*