**From:** Victor Ovchinnikov (*ovchinnv_at_mit.edu*)

**Date:** Mon Jun 18 2007 - 14:58:13 CDT

**Next message:**Jonathan Lee: "Re: Re: heat diffusion calculation"**Previous message:**QJos=E9_R=2E_Sabino=22?=: "Re: Re: heat diffusion calculation"**In reply to:**Jonathan Lee: "Re: heat diffusion calculation"**Next in thread:**Jonathan Lee: "Re: Re: heat diffusion calculation"**Reply:**Jonathan Lee: "Re: Re: heat diffusion calculation"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Jonathan,

The page numbers that you provide correspond to the calculations of the

temperature echos from an MD simulation (at least in the tutorial

version that I have)

Nevertheless, I can try to answer some of your questions:

1) Yes, it is a boundary condition to the diffusion equation on page 47.

2) Not sure where you are; step 11 on p.55 deals with temperature echos;

I'm certain that the script monitors the average temp of the system

including the outer shell; this is an approximation, since analytically,

the boundary has no volume, whereas in this case, it does; perhaps

that's why the agreement with the theoretical plot on p.49 is not

perfect.

3) The inner radius is 22, as defined in the VMD script that populates

the beta column of the PDB; the simulation domain is a sphere with

radius 26 Angstroms; so cutting off at 22 should apply to the outer

layer of the water molecules, since the diameter of a water moelcule is

roughly 3A. So the calculation _does_ take the radius into account; for

a larger radius, you would have to first solvate & equilibrate the

protein in a larger sphere; then when you ran VMD, increase to cutoff

accordingly.

4) Yes, the problem is that you need an analytical formula for the

solution of the heat equation in the rectangular domain; this should be

obtainable from a PDE book as a series solution (just like the spherical

formula) You would then need to take this solution and average over the

size of the box -- i.e. integrate over x,y,z & divide by the box size;

this would give you a an expression similar to the on p. 47

Regarding the physics of measuring diffusion, you are correct; it is

easiest to fix the temp. somewhere & put a probe at another location &

record your temperature values; This is the lab experiment, which would

give you a long-time averaged quantity (the duration of the experiment

is of the order of seconds). However, you can only do MD for a few

nanoseconds -- so your statistics for a quantity at one location would

be extremely poor. What the method outlined in the tutorial says, is

that you can still extract the diffusion coefficient from averaging over

multiple regions -- in this case the entire domain (which will give you

better statistics by orders of magnitude)

Best,

Victor

On Mon, 2007-06-18 at 12:16 -0500, Jonathan Lee wrote:

*> Anybody? Thanks.
*

*>
*

*> Jonathan
*

*>
*

*>
*

*> Jonathan Lee wrote:
*

*> > Hello all,
*

*> > I have some questions about the heat diffusion calculation in the
*

*> > NAMD tutorial (page 53).
*

*> >
*

*> > 1) The shell is maintained at a temperature of 200, right? (As
*

*> > opposed to just initialized to 200.)
*

*> > 2) What is the temperature that is output (step 11, page 55)? Is that
*

*> > the temperature of everything excluding the 200K shell?
*

*> > 3) It seems to me that the calculation should take into account the
*

*> > inner radius of the shell. If the radius is much larger, shouldn't it
*

*> > take a longer time for the diffusion to occur?
*

*> > 4) Can I do a similar calculation but with a rectangular prism domain
*

*> > (i.e. fix the temperature at one end and calculate the heat diffusion
*

*> > to the other end of the box)?
*

*> >
*

*> > Basically, my understanding is that the temperature should be
*

*> > maintained in one region and measured in another region a finite
*

*> > distance away. That distance (and the time of diffusion) should be
*

*> > taken into consideration when finding the diffusivity. Am I
*

*> > overlooking something? Thanks.
*

*> >
*

*> > Jonathan
*

*> >
*

*> >
*

*> >
*

*> >
*

*>
*

**Next message:**Jonathan Lee: "Re: Re: heat diffusion calculation"**Previous message:**QJos=E9_R=2E_Sabino=22?=: "Re: Re: heat diffusion calculation"**In reply to:**Jonathan Lee: "Re: heat diffusion calculation"**Next in thread:**Jonathan Lee: "Re: Re: heat diffusion calculation"**Reply:**Jonathan Lee: "Re: Re: heat diffusion calculation"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6
: Wed Feb 29 2012 - 05:20:21 CST
*