From: patrick wintrode (pat_wde2_at_yahoo.com)
Date: Thu May 25 2006 - 09:06:34 CDT
Thanks for the reply.
There's a certain amount of energy associated with a covalent bond. If the bond suddenly disappears, won't the instantaneous jump in energy mess up the simulation? (This was my rational for using constraints to mimic the presence of a bond instead).
Patrick L. Wintrode
Department of Physiology & Biophysics
Case Western Reserve University
Cleveland, OH 44106
Peter Freddolino <petefred_at_ks.uiuc.edu> wrote: Hi Patrick,
for 1), we probably need a more detailed description of the error you
get. Normally VMD plays nicely with preparing psfgen/namd input, but
there's no reason I can think of that SPDBV wouldn't work.
For 2), what you might just want to do is prepare 2 psf files, one of
which actually does have a bond there. There's no technical problem in
switching psf files between simulation sas long as they have they same
number of atoms.
patrick wintrode wrote:
> Hi all.
> I'm trying to set up a complicated simulation. Essentially, I want to
> use NAMD to look at how a protein responds when one of its loops is
> cleaved by a protease. My plan is to remove the peptide bond in the
> original pdb file (adding appropriate patches to the new N and C
> termini), then use restraints in order to mimic the presence of the
> bond. After the system has equilibrated, I'll turn off the restraints
> and watch how the system evolves in response.
> My questions:
> 1) what's the best way to prepare the modified pdb file? I tried doing
> it with SwissPDB, but when I used the resulting modified PDB file with
> PSFGEN, the new cleaved ends caused a fatal error.
> 2) does anyone know of the best place to look for how to set the
> restraints to mimic the presence of a peptide bond as accurately as
> Patrick L. Wintrode
> Assistant Professor
> Department of Physiology & Biophysics
> Case Western Reserve University
> Cleveland, OH 44106
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 05:19:30 CST