From: Jesper Sørensen (lists_at_jsx.dk)
Date: Wed May 18 2011 - 06:14:51 CDT
Thanks, but that doesn't really solve my problem with NAMD...
From: c00jsw00_at_nchc.narl.org.tw [mailto:c00jsw00_at_nchc.narl.org.tw]
Sent: 18. maj 2011 13:09
Subject: Re: namd-l: CUDA simulation memory usage
I used the command "nvidia-smi" to view the performance of my gpu card. Then I found that the performance of NAMD2.8b2 was very low (~ 13%). But the performance of ACEMD was very high (~ 100%).
From:Jesper Sørensen <lists_at_jsx.dk>
Date:Wed, 18 May 2011 12:03:17 +0200
Subject:namd-l: CUDA simulation memory usage
I have just been benchmarking our new cluster with GPUs and the memory usage that NAMD prints out at the end of the simulation run is MUCH larger with GPU's than without the GPU's.
WallClock: 1246.348877 CPUTime: 1246.348877 Memory: 41306.324219 MB
WallClock: 4025.868896 CPUTime: 4025.868896 Memory: 350.937500 MB
I am assuming that the Memory number with CUDA is wrong - mostly because I know that we don't have that much memory in these new machines. Is it taking memory on the GFX-card into account, or what is going on?
I've looked through the mailinglist, but I haven't been able to find anything on this issue...
Dept. of Chemistry
Aarhus University, Denmark
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 05:23:57 CST