Re: What binaries should I take?

From: Gianluca Interlandi (gianluca_at_bioc.unizh.ch)
Date: Fri Jun 18 2004 - 08:38:39 CDT

Hi all,

I don't want to say something wrong, but I think it is better to download
the source "NAMD_2.5_Source.tar.gz" and compile it. It is not too
difficult. I don't know whether the binaries use the gm-libraries for the
communication. So it is better to compile the source linking to the
installed myrinet-libraries. It would be a pity if the communication goes
through the gigabit instead of the more powerfull myrinet.

Best,

   Gianluca

On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Edward Patrick Obrien wrote:

>
> Hi Volodya,
> The group I'm has a linux beowulf cluster and uses the binary of
>
> NAMD_2.5_Linux-i686.tar.gz
>
> I hope that helps.
>
> Ed
>
>
> On Fri, 18 Jun 2004, Valodymyr Nechyporuk-Zloy wrote:
>
> > Dear users,
> >
> > I try to install the namd2 for Linux cluster. What binaries should I take?
> > I have:
> >
> > Number of nodes 96
> > Number of compute nodes 94
> > Theoretical peak performance (GFlops) 460.00
> > Total memory (GB) 97
> > 1. Interconnect Technology Fast Ethernet
> > 2. Interconnect Technology Myrinet
> > Operating System Red Hat Linux 7.3
> > Communication Software MPICH-gm
> >
> > Compute Nodes
> >
> > Modell IBM xSeries 335
> > Prozessor Intel Xeon 2.4 GHz
> > L2 Cache 512 Kilobyte
> > Hauptspeicher 1 Gigabyte
> > Swap 1 Gigabyte
> >
> >
> > Sincerely youre,
> >
> > Volodya
> >
>
>

-----------------------------------------------------
Gianluca Interlandi gianluca_at_bioc.unizh.ch
                    +41 (0) 1 635 55 93
                    +41 (0)79 655 73 35
                    http://biocroma.unizh.ch/gianluca/

PhD-Student of the Department of Biochemistry
at the University of Zurich Irchel, Switzerland
-----------------------------------------------------

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 05:18:17 CST