From: Gengbin Zheng (gzheng_at_ks.uiuc.edu)
Date: Sun Jan 04 2004 - 23:18:42 CST
Please find the charm++ and NAMD source files I used to compile the
Windows binary at:
http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/~gzheng/namd2.tgz (same as in the cvs version today)
Use this same source for Linux, and please don't download from the
Charm++ cvs server. Build charm++ for Linux with this command line:
./build charm++ net-linux -O -DCMK_OPTIMIZE
Keep in mind that the code in cvs server is changing every day recently
for a major Charm++ release soon coming in about a month. I can not
guarantee the cross platform compatibility to my previous namd2/win32
binary for arbitary cvs snapshot. So I figure it is better to give you the
snapshot I used for my testing.
The tcl and plugins are optional. You don't have to compile with them
if you don't need them. Fftw, however, is often found essential.
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Gengbin Zheng wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Jan 2004, Gadi Oron wrote:
> > Hello again...
> > On Fri, 2004-01-02 at 20:09, Gengbin Zheng wrote:
> > > > > > Another question: is it possible to set process priority (nice
> > > > > > for NAMD node programs?
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > No. It can be implemented but not for windows I guess.
> > > > >
> > >
> > > You can now. This has been implemented in Charm++ CVS server.
> > > It is only for non windows versions.
> > Thank you very much, this option is very helpful!
> > I believe though that with Cygwin the your implementation should be
> > functional. (The nice command exists).
> ok, Windows version of setting process priority (using SetPriorityClass
> Win32 call) is also implemented. It should work for both Cygwin(gcc) and
> pure windows(visual c++) binary.
> Since windows does not support numeric nice level - it only
> has these 6 levels (from high to low), I had to do a mapping from +nice
> parameter value to the win priority levels:
> REALTIME_PRIORITY_CLASS <= -20
> HIGH_PRIORITY_CLASS -20 - -10
> ABOVE_NORMAL_PRIORITY_CLASS -10 - 0
> NORMAL_PRIORITY_CLASS 0
> BELOW_NORMAL_PRIORITY_CLASS 0 - 10
> IDLE_PRIORITY_CLASS > 10
> Note that not every Windows supports ABOVE_NORMAL_PRIORITY_CLASS and
> BELOW_NORMAL_PRIORITY_CLASS for example win95/ME. So when not supported,
> the value will be overtaken by corresponding IDLE_PRIORITY_CLASS or
> Again, you may need administrator privilege to set high priorities.
> Same as explained in previous email, to set priority nice level, you can:
> 1. ./charmrun +p4 ./pgm +nice -5
> to set nice level to -5 (higher priority) for all 4 node processes.
> This works for *all* charm/NAMD version now.
> 2. put ++nice in a nodelist file:
> group main
> host host-1 ++nice 2
> host host-2 ++nice -2
> This only works for net-* version when nodelist is read.
> My test shows that setting very high priority under windows do have
> noticeable good impact in the execution time.
> The latest NAMD win32/VC++ binary for testing is now at:
> It is compiled with Charm++/net-win32 with -O -DCMK_OPTIMIZE
> and NAMD/Win32-i686-MSVC with tcl and plugins libraries.
> The VC++ I was using to compile the binary donot have
> BELOW_NORMAL_PRIORITY_CLASS and ABOVE_NORMAL_PRIORITY_CLASS defined, so
> these two priorities are not supported in this binary.
> (for cross linux/windows clusters usage, please note that you need exact
> same charm++ source code from cvs, also with exact *Charm++ defined
> macros* - that is with or without -DCMK_OPTIMIZE, binaries with
> CMK_OPTIMIZE is not compatible with the one compiled without the flag
> when running cross the platforms.)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 05:18:01 CST