From: LEWYN LI (ll2150_at_columbia.edu)
Date: Mon Dec 13 2004 - 16:53:26 CST
Hi there! This is Lewyn at Columbia. Nice to "catch up" with you
at the namd-l website.
Anyway, to answer your question: according to my experience,
"*****" is not a problem with NAMD, because, if I remember correctly, NAMD
has its own "internal" numbering system and therefore doesn't really care
Just to be safe, I usually start off with a pdb file that has the
correct numbering i.e. atom 100000 and above. After a simulation, I got
pdb files with "*****", but NAMD didn't complain. So I suppose everything
Hope this helps.
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, Gilbert G.Feng wrote:
> I am building a big system that contains more than 99999 atoms. It looks
> the pdb file is designed to record, at most, 99999 atoms. If the system is
> bigger, I got "*****" for the number of the atom. Can the NAMD
> handle this case? and how?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Feb 29 2012 - 15:38:04 CST